Imported pigment – Su-ma-li blue
◎ Micrography and appraisement of genuine and fake porcelains◎
= > Magnification B
Source A: DCL-CARD / Meip’ing vase with underglaze blue decoration of clouds and dragons, Ming dynasty (1279-1368)
Source B: DCL-CARD / Modern phony-Shard of dish with underglaze blue decoration of figures, Yuan dynasty (1279-1368).
Illustration A: Su-ma-li blue pigment contains high amount of iron, so blackish or greenish brown iron rust spots remains on the surface of glaze. Iron rust spots of genuine porcelain formed gradually after hundred years. The spots naturally emerged and were embedded into clay. The slightly diffused spots usually appeared in deep glazing area and had vague borderline.
Illustration B: The imitation of Su-ma-li blue is adding iron oxide in pigment. The artificial material presents angular shape and has clear borderline with underglaze blue pigment. Fake iron rust spots didn’t have varied shades and distributed irregular both in shallow and deep glazing areas.
◎ Reference:
1. Zhang, Hong-wei. Ancient Chinese Ceramics Research, Vol. 10, Beijing: Forbidden City, 2004.
2. Zhang, Pu-sheng. Blue and White Porcelain Appraisement, Beijing: Beijing Library, Jan. 1995.
3. Liu Ru-shui. Appreciation of China, Taipei: Shuchuan, Aug. 2004.
4. Ma, Xi-gui. Chinese Blue and White Porcelain, Shanghai: Shanghai Gu Ji, 1999.
5. Yang Jia-luo. A record of Ceramics, Vol. 1&2, Taipei: World Bookstore, 1974.
6. Lan Pu/ Zheng, Ting-gui. Pottery Record of Jingdezhen, Shandong: Hua-bao, 2004.
7. She Cheng. Development of Blue and White Porcelain in Ming Dynasty and Art Research, Taipei: Wen Shi zhe, Mar. 1986.
8. Li, Hui-bing. Appraisement Foundations of Chinese Porcelain, Beijing: Forbidden City, 2001.
9. Liu, Liang You. Research of Antique Porcelain, Taipei: Youth Culture, Jan. 1988.
10. Zhu Yan. Pottery, 1774.
沒有留言:
張貼留言